Secondary Victim Claim: UK Supreme Court Limits Rights

Close-up of a judge’s gavel representing legal judgments in secondary victim claim cases

The UK Supreme Court recently changed secondary victim claim cases significantly. Consequently, this ruling now reshapes psychiatric injury law in medical negligence claims. Therefore, many families no longer meet the criteria to receive compensation.

At Dawn Solicitors, we fully understand that witnessing the sudden loss of a loved one causes deep trauma. Hence, our expert team guides you through the legal process with clarity, compassion, and confidence.

Key areas explored in this article

  • What Is a Secondary Victim Claim?
  • Paul v Royal Wolverhampton: Secondary Victim Claim Impact.
  • Key Criteria for a Secondary Victim Claim.
  • Secondary Victim Claim: What This Means for You.
  • How Dawn Solicitors Can Help with Your Claim.
  • Conclusion.
  • FAQ’s.

What Is a Secondary Victim Claim?

A secondary victim claim arises when someone experiences psychiatric injury after they witness a traumatic event. Usually, the claimant does not suffer the harm directly. Instead, they are a close relative or bystander who observes the incident and suffers mentally as a result.

Traditionally, courts have accepted these claims only when strict conditions are met. Specifically, the claimant must witness the event with their own senses. Moreover, they must be present at the scene. Additionally, they must share a close relationship with the primary victim.

Paul v Royal Wolverhampton: Secondary Victim Claim Impact

In 2024, the UK Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, fundamentally reshaping the rules for bringing a victim claim that is secondary in nature. The Court actively examined whether individuals who witness the traumatic death of a loved one due to clinical negligence can claim compensation for psychiatric harm.

From the outset, the Court clarified that not all distressing events qualify for a legal claim. Specifically, it ruled that witnessing a loved one’s gradual medical death even if due to negligence is not enough. Instead, the Court required an “accident,” defined as a sudden, external, and shocking event causing injury or death.

Consequently, the Court drew a line between sudden accidents like car crashes, which may allow claims, and slow medical events. Even if tragic, drawn-out emergencies don’t meet the legal threshold. This decision limits psychiatric injury claims. Therefore, many affected people may now face challenges seeking justice. Although the Court acknowledged the emotional toll, it kept legal duties narrow.

At the same time, the ruling offers clarity on this complex issue. As a result, families affected by medical negligence should seek expert advice before starting a claim.

Key Criteria for a Secondary Victim Claim

To succeed with a secondary victim claim, you must now meet several strict conditions.

  • First, you need to prove a close relationship with the primary victim.
  • Next, you must show that you directly experienced the traumatic event with your own senses.
  • Additionally, the incident must involve a sudden and shocking accident.
  • Finally, you must suffer a recognisable psychiatric injury, such as PTSD.

As a result of the recent court decision, meeting these legal tests has now become much more difficult.

Book your call today

Book Your Consultation Today!

Secondary Victim Claim: What This Means for You

If you witnessed a medical incident and suffered mental trauma, the law may now limit your right to claim. Still, each case requires a unique assessment.

At Dawn Solicitors, we carefully examine whether your claim meets the updated legal standards. In addition, we provide a thorough review and actively explore other legal remedies where appropriate.

How Dawn Solicitors Can Help with Your Claim

At Dawn Solicitors, we proudly deliver expert legal advice tailored to sensitive and complex claims. Moreover, our experienced team handles psychiatric injury cases and fully understands the emotional impact involved.

From your very first consultation, we support you at every step; in fact, we focus on building a strong legal argument from the outset. Even if your victim claim no longer qualifies under current law, we will still guide you through alternative legal options. Ultimately, your recovery matters, and therefore, we remain here to help you with clear and compassionate support.

To contact a solicitor from our firm, simply call us at +44 1753 530 111  or send us an email on info@dawnsolicitors.com

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision now clearly narrows the path for a victim claim that is secondary in nature, particularly in medical negligence cases. However, with expert legal advice, you can still explore the most effective course of action.

Therefore, contact Dawn Solicitors today to discuss your situation in detail. We are always ready to support you with professional and compassionate guidance.

Two cars involved in a rear-end collision, often leading to secondary victim claims for psychiatric injury

FAQ’s

Q.1 Can I still bring a secondary victim claim if I witnessed a hospital death?

Possibly, but only if the event qualifies as a sudden accident. Medical deterioration is no longer enough.

Q.2 What support can Dawn Solicitors offer for psychiatric injury claims?

We offer case assessments, explain your rights, and help you explore alternative routes if the new rules affect your claim.

Related Links